On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:34 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the record, the third idea proposed was to use 1 for the first > > byte, so that 0 is reserved for NULL and works with memset(0). Here's > > an attempt at that. > > ... erm, though, duh, I forgot to adjust Assert(val > base). One more time.
I like this idea and think this might have the side benefit of making it harder to get away with accessing relptr_off directly. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
