> On Apr 12, 2018, at 09:17, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, that's interesting. So you want the children to inherit the > parent's tablespace when they are created, but if the parent's > tablespace is later changed, the existing children don't move?
+1 to that behavior. While it's always possible to just say "do the right thing" to the application when creating new children (that is, expect that they will always specify a tablespace if it's not the default), this seems like the least-surprising behavior. It's true that an unpartitioned table will always be created in the default tablespace unless otherwise specified, but child tables are sufficiently distinct from that case that I don't see it as a painful asymmetry. -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com