Hi everyone!

I've also attached the pg_rewind optimization patch file for Postgres version 
14.4. The previous patch file targets version Postgres version 15 Beta 1/2.

Thanks,
Justin
________________________________
From: Justin Kwan <jk...@cloudflare.com>
Sent: July 15, 2022 6:13 PM
To: vignesh ravichandran <ad...@viggy28.dev>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org>; vignesh 
<vign...@cloudflare.com>; justinpk...@outlook.com <justinpk...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster

Looping in my other email.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:22 AM vignesh ravichandran 
<ad...@viggy28.dev<mailto:ad...@viggy28.dev>> wrote:
Hi Hackers,

I have been using pg_rewind in production for 2 years. One of the things that I 
noticed in pg_rewind is if it doesn't know what to do with a file "it copies". 
I understand it's the more safer option. After all, the alternative, 
pg_basebackup copies all the files from source to target.

However, this is making pg_rewind inefficient when we have a high number of WAL 
files. Majority of the data (in most of my cases 95%+) that it copies are WAL 
files which are anyway same between the source and target. Skipping those same 
WAL files from copying will improve the speed of pg_rewind a lot.

1. Does pg_rewind need to copy WAL files before the WAL that contains the last 
common check point?

Heikki's presentation 
https://pgsessions.com/assets/archives/pg_rewind-presentation-paris.pdf gave me 
a good overview and also explained the behavior what I mentioned.

Thanks,
Vignesh

Attachment: v1-pg14.4-0001-Avoid-copying-WAL-segments-before-divergence-to-spee.patch
Description: v1-pg14.4-0001-Avoid-copying-WAL-segments-before-divergence-to-spee.patch

Reply via email to