On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:26:36PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > My plan now is to commit this patch so that problem #1 is solved, prod > conchuela's owner to upgrade to solve #2, and wait until Tom shuts > down prairiedog to solve #3. Then we could consider removing the > HAVE_FDATASYNC probe and associated #ifdefs when convenient. For that > reason, I'm not too bothered about the slight weirdness of defining > HAVE_FDATASYNC on Windows even though that doesn't come from > configure; it'd hopefully be short-lived. Better ideas welcome, > though. Does that make sense?
Do you still need HAVE_DECL_FDATASYNC? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
