On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 4:23 PM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 3 Aug 2022, at 10:10, Junwang Zhao <zhjw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think in the following sentence, were should be replaced with have, > > what do you think? > > > > ``` > > /* > > - * We were just issued a SAVEPOINT inside a > > transaction block. > > + * We have just issued a SAVEPOINT inside a > > transaction block. > > * Start a subtransaction. (DefineSavepoint already > > did > > * PushTransaction, so as to have someplace to > > put the SUBBEGIN > > * state.) > > ``` > > I'm not so sure. If I read this right the intent of the sentence is to convey > that the user has issued a SAVEPOINT to the backend, not the backend itself. > I > think the current wording is the correct one. >
Got it, using `were` here means the backend is the receiver of the action, not the sender. That makes sense, thanks a lot. > -- > Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/ > -- Regards Junwang Zhao
