On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:42 AM Robert Treat <r...@xzilla.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:15 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Attachment is a corrected version based on Tom's suggestion. > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:56 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > > Erikjan Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> writes: > > > > I don't think these "were"s are wrong but arguably changing them to > > > > "have" helps non-native speakers (like myself), as it doesn't change the > > > > meaning significantly as far as I can see. > > > > > > I think it does --- it changes the meaning from passive to active. > > > I don't necessarily object to rewriting these sentences more broadly, > > > but I don't think "have issued" is the correct phrasing. > > > > > > Possibly "The user issued ..." would work. > > > > > Is there a reason that the first case says "just" issued vs the other > two cases? It seems to me that it should be removed. Attachment is a patch with the "just" removed.
Thanks > > Robert Treat > https://xzilla.net -- Regards Junwang Zhao
0001-doc-rewrite-some-comments-to-make-them-more-precise.patch
Description: Binary data
