On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 8:36 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 15.08.22 03:48, Thomas Munro wrote: > >> I vaguely remember successfully trying it in the past. But I just tried it > >> unsuccessfully in a VM and there's a bunch of other places saying it's not > >> working... > >> https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4240 > > I think we'd better remove our claim that it works then. Patch attached. > > When I developed support for abstract unix sockets, I did test them on > Windows. The lack of support on WSL appears to be an unrelated fact. > See for example how [0] talks about them separately.
User amoldeshpande's complaint was posted to the WSL project's issue tracker but it's about native Windows/winsock code and s/he says so explicitly (though other people pile in with various other complaints including WSL interop). User sunilmut's comment says it's not working, and [0] is now just confusing everybody :-(
