David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > Does anyone have any objections to d5ee4db0e in its entirety being > backpatched?
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug in the back branches, but by the same token it's harmless. regards, tom lane
David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > Does anyone have any objections to d5ee4db0e in its entirety being > backpatched?
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug in the back branches, but by the same token it's harmless. regards, tom lane