> On Sep 7, 2022, at 4:09 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> 
> Calling this a redesign is over-stating things, imv … and I’d much rather 
> have the per-relation granularity than predefined roles for this, so there is 
> that to consider too, perhaps.

Ok, now I'm a bit lost.  If I want to use Nathan's feature to create a role to 
vacuum and analyze my database on a regular basis, how does per-relation 
granularity help me?  If somebody creates a new table and doesn't grant those 
privileges to the role, doesn't that break the usage case?  To me, per-relation 
granularity sounds useful, but orthogonal, to this feature.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company





Reply via email to