po 12. 9. 2022 v 9:59 odesÃlatel Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> napsal:
> > On 9 Sep 2022, at 11:00, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 9, 2022, at 5:53 PM, John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Note that the grammar has shift-reduce conflicts. > > > Looks like the last rule for Filters should not be there. > > Correct, fixed in the attached. > > > I do wonder whether we should be using bison/flex here, seems like using > a > > sledgehammer to crack a nut. > > > I don't the capabilities of the tool is all that interesting compared to > the > long term maintainability and readability of the source code. Personally I > think a simple Bison/Flex parser is easier to read and reason about than > the > corresponding written in C. > When this work is done, then there is no reason to throw it. The parser in bison/flex does the same work and it is true, so code is more readable. Although for this case, a handy written parser was trivial too. Regards Pavel > > -- > Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/ > >