At Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:29:52 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote 
in 
> So, the change related to wal_decode_buffer_size needs to be
> backpatched to 15 whereas other message changes will be HEAD only, am
> I correct?

Has 15 closed the entry?  IMHO I supposed that all changes are applied
back(?) to 15.

regardes.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


Reply via email to