At Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:29:52 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote in > So, the change related to wal_decode_buffer_size needs to be > backpatched to 15 whereas other message changes will be HEAD only, am > I correct?
Has 15 closed the entry? IMHO I supposed that all changes are applied back(?) to 15. regardes. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center