On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:07 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > At Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:29:52 +0530, Amit Kapila <[email protected]> > wrote in > > So, the change related to wal_decode_buffer_size needs to be > > backpatched to 15 whereas other message changes will be HEAD only, am > > I correct? > > Has 15 closed the entry? IMHO I supposed that all changes are applied > back(?) to 15. >
We only want to commit the changes to 15 (a) if those fixes a problem introduced in 15, or (b) those are for a bug fix. I think the error message improvements fall into none of those categories, we can map it to (b) but I feel those are an improvement in the current messages and don't seem critical to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
