Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the “or a tuple has come for a different relation than that
> for the accumulated tuples" part in the comment is a leftover from an
> earlier version of the patch [1]. As the code shows, we do not handle
> that case anymore, so I think we should remove that part from the
> comment. Attached is a patch for that.
+1, but what remains still seems awkwardly worded. How about something
like "When we've reached the desired batch size, perform the insertion"?
regards, tom lane
