Hi, On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:42 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> writes: > > I think the “or a tuple has come for a different relation than that > > for the accumulated tuples" part in the comment is a leftover from an > > earlier version of the patch [1]. As the code shows, we do not handle > > that case anymore, so I think we should remove that part from the > > comment. Attached is a patch for that. > > +1, but what remains still seems awkwardly worded. How about something > like "When we've reached the desired batch size, perform the insertion"?
+1 for that change. Pushed that way. Thanks for reviewing! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
