On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 06:40:44PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Fair enough. PFA the corrected patch v5.
Is there a reason why you need a TAP test here? It is by design more expensive than pg_regress and it does not require --enable-tap-tests. See for example what we do for snapshot_too_old, commit_ts, worker_spi, etc., where each module uses a custom configuration file. Hmm. If I were to write that, I think that I would make the SLRU directory configurable as a PGC_POSTMASTER, at least, for the purpose of the exercise, and also split test_slru() into more user-callable functions so as it would be possible to mix more cross-check scenarios with the low-level C APIs if need be, with adapted input parameters. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature