Hi, Alexander! > > I have reworked that as per the attached, that provides basically the > > same coverage, going through a SQL interface for the whole thing. > > Like all the other tests of its kind, this does not use a TAP test, > > relying on a custom configuration file instead. This still needs some > > polishing, but the basics are here. > > Many thanks for the updated patch. I didn't know one can run tests > with a custom postgresql.conf without using TAP tests. > > > What do you think? > > It looks much better than before. I replaced strcpy() with strncpy() > and pgindent'ed the code. Other than that to me it looks ready to be > committed. I've looked through the patch again. I agree it looks better and can be committed. Mark it as RfC now.
Regards, Pavel Borisov
