Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Uh, XTS doesn't require a nonce, so why are talking about nonces in this > thread?
Because some other proposals do, or could, require a per-page nonce. After looking through this thread, I side with Robert: we should reject the remainder of this patch. It gives up page layout flexibility that we might want back someday. Moreover, I didn't see any hard evidence offered that there's any actual performance gain, let alone such a compelling gain that we should give up that flexibility for it. regards, tom lane