On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:51 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > I was only talking about the actual argument to getopt(), not the > > order of the code stanzas. I'm not sure what we ought to do about the > > latter. > > 100% agreed that the getopt argument should just be alphabetical. > But the bulk of Peter's patch is rearranging switch cases to agree > with that, and if you want to do that then you have to also think > about long options, which are not in the getopt argument. I'm > not entirely convinced that reordering the switch cases is worth > troubling over.
I'm not particularly sold on that either, but neither am I particularly opposed to it. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
