Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2022-12-08 Th 21:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I was planning to take a look at that before walking away from
>> this stuff. (I'm sure not volunteering to convert ALL the input
>> functions, but I'll do the datetime code.)
> Awesome. Perhaps if there are no more comments you can commit what you
> currently have so people can start work on other input functions.
Pushed. As I said, I'll take a look at the datetime area. Do we
have any volunteers for other input functions?
regards, tom lane
