On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:35 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:32:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > That seems rather OK seen from here. I'll see about getting that > > applied except if there is an objection of any kind. > > Okay, I have looked at that again this morning and I've spotted one > tiny issue: specifying --progress with --skip-checksums does not > really make sense.
I thought that too, but I thought it's better to ignore it, instead of erroring out. For example, we can specify both --disable and --progress options to pg_checksum commands, but we don't write any progress information in this case. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
