On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:45 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:27:51PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > I thought that too, but I thought it's better to ignore it, instead of > > erroring out. For example, we can specify both --disable and > > --progress options to pg_checksum commands, but we don't write any > > progress information in this case. > > Well, if you don't feel strongly about that, that's fine by me as > well, so I have applied your v3 with the tweaks I posted previously, > without the restriction on --skip-checksums.
Thank you! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
