On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:56 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:40 PM Amit Kapila <akap...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > Use appropriate wait event when sending data in the apply worker. > > > > Currently, we reuse WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_PARALLEL_APPLY_STATE_CHANGE in the > > apply worker while sending data to the parallel apply worker via a shared > > memory queue. This is not appropriate as one won't be able to distinguish > > whether the worker is waiting for sending data or for the state change. > > > > To patch instead uses the wait event WAIT_EVENT_MQ_SEND which has been > > already used in blocking mode while sending data via a shared memory > > queue. > > This is not right at all. You should invent a new wait state if you're > waiting in a new place. >
This is a misunderstanding on my part to reuse the wait_event for a similar kind of wait but I got your point and will take care of this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
