On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:05:04PM +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote: > On 15.02.2023 10:11, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Which comes down to blame me for both of them. > > My only intention was to make postgres better.I'm sorry you took it that > way.
You have no need to feel sorry about that. I really appreciate that you took the time to report this issue, so don't worry. My point is that I have committed this code, so basically it is my responsibility to take care of its maintenance. >> So, please find attached a patch to close the gap the sample files, >> for both things, with descriptions of all the field values they can >> use. > > A short and precise description. Nothing to add.Next time I will try to > offer a patch at once. If you have a proposal of patch, that's always nice to have, but you should not feel obliged to do so, either. Thanks a lot for the report, Pavel! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
