On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 08:11, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Hmm, I am not sure that adding more examples in the sample files is > worth the duplication with the docs.
I think you misunderstood what I meant (because I admittedly didn't write it down clearly). I meant the docs for pg_ident don't include any examples (only descriptions of the new patterns). Attached is a patch that addresses that. > So, please find attached a patch to close the gap the sample files, > for both things, with descriptions of all the field values they can > use. LGTM
0001-Add-example-of-new-pg_ident-username-paterns-to-docs.patch
Description: Binary data
