On 2/22/23 8:39 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 17 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
Superuser-only GUCs should be documented as such, or do you intend to make it user-settable like I suggested upthread :) ?I don't really have strong feelings, so I reverted to being user-settable since I can't really present a strong argument for superuser-only.
I was going to present some weak arguments, but not worth it. Anything around using up CPU cycles would be true of just writing plain old queries.
The attached is a rebase on top of master with no other additional hacking done on top of the above review comments.
Generally LGTM. I read through earlier comments (sorry I missed replying) and have nothing to add or object to.
Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
