Hello Amit Langote wrote:
> +1 to this more radical overhaul of this part of the documentation. Thanks. I pushed now after some more tweaking, including your suggested corrections. I removed the examples, because they were both wrong. We can give this more polish if anybody has the energy, but I think we're in a pretty decent place now. I'm not convinced that we need to show so much detail on pruning as proposed by Robert elsewhere; we didn't have a lot of detail for exclusion either and I don't have any evidence that it was a terrible problem for users. Also, one possible use of the new GUC is that you can compare plans if you so wish. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
