Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 05.03.23 00:04, Tom Lane wrote: >> I've gone through this and have a modest suggestion: let's invent some >> wrapper functions around encode(sha256()) to reduce the cosmetic diffs >> and consequent need for closer study of patch changes. In the attached >> I called them "notmd5()", but I'm surely not wedded to that name.
> Do you mean create this on the fly in the test suite, or make it a new > built-in function? The former --- please read my version of the patch. regards, tom lane