On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:17PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote: > A minor comment for the README is that now we have five support > functions not four. > > - outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all four support > + outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all five support
Right, missed that. How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here and make that simpler? I would propose: "For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support functions." -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
