> On 20 Mar 2023, at 08:46, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
> and make that simpler?  I would propose:
> "For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
> functions."

Yes please, keeping such counts in sync is always error-prone.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to