Hi, I had a quick look at the v7 patch. You might consider to encapsulate some of this logic in new functions like:
void LogReplicationSlotAquired(bool is_physical, char *slotname) { loglevel = log_replication_commands ? LOG : DEBUG3; if (is_physical) ereport(loglevel, (errmsg("acquired physical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname))); else ereport(loglevel, (errmsg("acquired logical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname))); } void LogReplicationSlotReleased(bool is_physical, char *slotname) { loglevel = log_replication_commands ? LOG : DEBUG3; if (is_physical) ereport(loglevel, (errmsg("released physical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname))); else ereport(loglevel, (errmsg("released logical replication slot \"%s\"", slotname))); } ~~ THEN ReplicationSlotShmemExit and WalSndErrorCleanup can call it like: if (MyReplicationSlot != NULL) { bool is_physical = SlotIsPhysical(MyReplicationSlot); char *slotname = pstrdup(NameStr(MyReplicationSlot->data.name)); ReplicationSlotRelease(); LogReplicationSlotReleased(is_physical, slotname); } ~ StartlReplication can call like: LogReplicationSlotAquired(true, cmd->slotname); ... LogReplicationSlotReleased(true, cmd->slotname); ~ StartLogicalReplication can call like: LogReplicationSlotAquired(false, cmd->slotname); ... LogReplicationSlotReleased(false, cmd->slotname); ~~~ TBH, I am not sure for the *current* code if the encapsulation is worth the trouble or not. But maybe at least it helps message consistency and will make it easier if future callers are needed. I guess those functions could also give you some central point to comment the intent of this logging? Feel free to take or leave this code suggestion. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia