Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 01:40:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * Why does LookupCustodianFunctions think it needs to search the
>> constant array?
> The order of the tasks in the array isn't guaranteed to match the order in
> the CustodianTask enum.
Why not? It's a constant array, we can surely manage to make its
order match the enum.
>> * The original proposal included moving RemovePgTempFiles into this
>> mechanism, which I thought was probably the most useful bit of the
>> whole thing. I'm sad to see that gone, what became of it?
> I postponed that based on advice from upthread [1]. I was hoping to start
> a dedicated thread for that immediately after the custodian infrastructure
> was committed. FWIW I agree that it's the most useful task of what's
> proposed thus far.
Hmm, given Andres' objections there's little point in moving forward
without that task.
regards, tom lane
