On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2023, at 16:53, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > I think "logical" should be a <literal> here. > > Agree, it should in order to be consistent.
Indeed.
+ to the wal_level parameter change on the primary won't be decoded.
This wal_level should also have a markup.
Number of uses of logical slots in this database that have been
- canceled due to old snapshots or a too low <xref
linkend="guc-wal-level"/>
+ canceled due to old snapshots or too low a <xref
linkend="guc-wal-level"/>
This sounds a bit strange to me. A too low wal_level would be a cause
for a cancel, hence shouldn't this be "canceled due to old snapshots
or due to a too low guc-wal-level?
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
