> On Apr 12, 2023, at 8:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "hey, I'd like that too" I like the idea in principle. I have been developing a testing infrastructure in my spare time and would rather not duplicate Andrew's TAP logic. If we get this pushed down into the server itself, all the test infrastructure can use a single, shared solution. As for the implementation, I just briefly scanned the patch. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port t... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused po... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused po... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused po... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unuse... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an u... Robert Haas
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to ... Robert Haas
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Greg Stark
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Robert Haas
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Robert Haas
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Michael Paquier
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Yurii Rashkovskii
- Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres... Peter Eisentraut