On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 02:24:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't really want external code knowing that line 4 is the port, > because I foresee us breaking that someday --- what will happen > when we want to allow one postmaster to support multiple ports? > Maybe we'll decide that we don't have to reflect that in the > pidfile, but let's not constrain our decisions ahead of time.
In the same fashion as something mentioned upthread, the format
portability would not matter much if all the information from the PID
file is wrapped around a pg_ctl command or something equivalent that
controls its output format, say:
pg_ctl -D $PGDATA --format={json,what_you_want} postmaster_file
To be more precise, storage.sgml documents the format of the PID file
in what seems like the correct order for each item, some of them being
empty depending on the setup.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
