Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
> I mainly put save_errno back into SOCK_ERRNO for greppability, I don't have
> any
> strong opinions either way so I went with the latter suggestion. Attached v3
> does the above change and passes the tests both with a broken and working
> system CA pool. Unless objections from those with failing local envs I
> propose
> this is pushed to close the open item.
One more question when looking at it with fresh eyes: should the argument
of X509_verify_cert_error_string be "ecode" or "vcode"?
regards, tom lane
