> On 14 Apr 2023, at 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14 Apr 2023, at 15:51, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> writes: >>> I mainly put save_errno back into SOCK_ERRNO for greppability, I don't have >>> any >>> strong opinions either way so I went with the latter suggestion. Attached >>> v3 >>> does the above change and passes the tests both with a broken and working >>> system CA pool. Unless objections from those with failing local envs I >>> propose >>> this is pushed to close the open item. >> >> One more question when looking at it with fresh eyes: should the argument >> of X509_verify_cert_error_string be "ecode" or "vcode"? > > Good catch, it should be vcode.
And again with the attachment. -- Daniel Gustafsson
libpq_system_ca_fix_v4.diff
Description: Binary data
