Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> Fixed.
v2 looks good to me, except the documentation wording for --with-role
is needlessly inconsistent with --with-admin. The --with-admin
wording looks better, so I suggest
- Indicates the specified existing role should be automatically
+ Specifies an existing role that will be automatically
added as a member of the new role. Multiple existing roles can
> How do folks feel about keeping --role undocumented? Should we give it a
> mention in the docs for --member-of?
I'm okay with leaving it undocumented, but I won't fight about it
if somebody wants to argue for the other.
regards, tom lane
