On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:11 PM Jelte Fennema <postg...@jeltef.nl> wrote: > > I think using `now()` is quite prone to sequence rollover. With the > current patch inserting more than 2^18~=0.26M rows into a table with > `gen_uuid_v7()` as the default in a single transaction would already > cause sequence rollover.
Well, the current patch will just use now()+1ms when 2^18 is exhausted. Even if now() would be passed as an argument (however current patch does not support an argument). Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
