Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:58:04PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: >> Works for me. I've started a test run with the xlc version change.
> It failed similarly: > + 23:59:00-07 | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00 | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00 > | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00 > + 23:59:59.99-07 | 4294966103:00:00.01+00 | 4294966103:00:00.01+00 > | 4294966103:00:00.01+00 Ugh. So if the failure is robust enough to persist across several major xlc versions, why couldn't Thomas reproduce it? regards, tom lane