On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 01:40:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > makes the failure go away. Unfortunately, I've not yet found another > way to make it go away :-(. My upthread idea of using a local variable > instead of result->time is no help, and some other random code > alterations didn't change the results either.
That may be a long shot, but even a modulo? Say in these two code paths: - while (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) - result->time -= USECS_PER_DAY; + if (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) + result->time %= USECS_PER_DAY; > Not sure where we go from here. While I don't have much hesitation > about blowing off xlc_r 12.1, it would be sad if their latest > toolchain doesn't work either. (I didn't try permuting the code > while using the newer compiler, though.) We've spent a lot of time on that. I'm OK to just give up, trim the values of the view with a qual, and call it a day. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
