On 2023-11-15 11:02:19 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote: > > I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to > > testwrap > > indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a) > > don't > > need two test() invocations, b) could still see the test name etc in the > > test > > invocation. > > Here is a patch that does it that way.
WFM!
