On 2024-Jan-30, Pavel Stehule wrote: > some basic variant (without autovacuum support) can be good enough. We have > no autovacuum support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY and I don't see a necessity > for it (sure, it can be limited by my perspective) . The necessity of > reducing table size is not too common (a lot of use cases are better > covered by using partitioning), but sometimes it is, and then buildin > simple available solution can be helpful.
That's my thinking as well. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
