On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:17PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > And I believe that CONTEXT, if it exists, is augmentation information > to the primary messages. The objective of the precedent for the use of > relname_only was somewhat different, but this use also seems legit. > > In short, I think the distribution between message types (primary and > context) is fine as it is in the latest patch.
Okay, thanks for the feedback. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
