On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, as far as I know, it's up to me which parts of your emails I want to > quote in my reply. I did read this part. It did not change my opinion. My > fundamental objection to your proposal is that I think it is too wordy. I > think users will generally know whether they are using partitioning or > inheritance, and if they don't it's not hard to figure out. I don't think > quoting only part of what you wrote made the quote misleading, but it did > allow me to express my opinion.
I would usually believe that people have read complete email before replying. But when the reply raises a question without quoting a portion of my mail which I think has the answer, I am confused. There's no straight forward method to avoid that confusion given it's written and turn based communication. But I try to get clarity on that confusion. > I understand that you don't agree, which is > fine, but I stand by my position. > I am fine with disagreement, now that I know why there's disagreement. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
