On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 1:14 PM Nisha Moond <nisha.moond...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please find the attached 'patch0003', which implements conflict > resolutions according to the global resolver settings. > > Summary of Conflict Resolutions Implemented in 'patch0003': > > INSERT Conflicts: > ------------------------ > 1) Conflict Type: 'insert_exists' > > Supported Resolutions: > a) 'remote_apply': Convert the INSERT to an UPDATE and apply. > b) 'keep_local': Ignore the incoming (conflicting) INSERT and retain > the local tuple. > c) 'error': The apply worker will error out and restart. > > Hi Nisha, While testing the patch, when conflict resolution is configured and insert_exists is set to "remote_apply", I see this warning in the logs due to a resource not being closed: 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] LOG: conflict insert_exists detected on relation "public.test1" 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] DETAIL: Key already exists. Applying resolution method "remote_apply" 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] CONTEXT: processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16417" during message type "INSERT" for replication target relation "public.test1" in transaction 763, finished at 0/15E7F68 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] WARNING: resource was not closed: [138] (rel=base/5/16413, blockNum=0, flags=0x93800000, refcount=1 1) 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] CONTEXT: processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16417" during message type "COMMIT" in transaction 763, finished at 0/15E7F68 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] WARNING: resource was not closed: TupleDesc 0x7f8c0439e448 (16402,-1) 2024-07-01 02:52:59.427 EDT [20304] CONTEXT: processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16417" during message type "COMMIT" in transaction 763, finished at 0/15E7F68 regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
