On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 6:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 1:35 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Setting resolvers at table-level and subscription-level sounds good to
> > me. DDLs for setting resolvers at subscription-level would need the
> > subscription name to be specified?
> >
>
> Yes, it should be part of the ALTER/CREATE SUBSCRIPTION command. One
> idea could be to have syntax as follows:
>
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION name SET CONFLICT RESOLVER 'conflict_resolver' FOR
> 'conflict_type';
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION name RESET CONFLICT RESOLVER FOR 'conflict_type';
>
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION subscription_name CONNECTION 'conninfo'
> PUBLICATION publication_name [, ...] CONFLICT RESOLVER
> 'conflict_resolver' FOR 'conflict_type';

Looks good to me.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to