On 15.07.24 16:52, Chapman Flack wrote:
On 07/15/24 10:46, Chapman Flack wrote:
Ah, I may have mistaken which functions the patch meant to apply to.
...
Any choice to use similar argument names in the regexp_* functions would
be a matter of consistency with the analogous ISO functions, not anything
mandated.
Or, looking back, I might have realized these were the non-ISO regexp_*
functions, but seen there was bikeshedding happening over the best name
to use for the occurrence argument, and merely suggested ISO's choice
OCCURRENCE for the analogous ISO functions, as a possible bikeshed
accelerator.
These functions were copied from Oracle, so one argument was to use the
names from Oracle as-is.
