On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 5:48 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > The small issue is that table 9.10 offers this syntax diagram > for regexp_replace: > > regexp_replace ( string text, pattern text, replacement text [, start integer > ] [, flags text ] ) → text > > This implies that it's valid to write > > regexp_replace (string, pattern, replacement, start, flags) > > but it is not: we have no function matching that signature. I'm not > in a hurry to add one, either, for fear of ambiguity against the other > regexp_replace signature. I think this needs to be broken into two > syntax diagrams: > > regexp_replace ( string text, pattern text, replacement text [, start integer > ] ) → text > regexp_replace ( string text, pattern text, replacement text [, flags text ] > ) → text >
this problem is still there, after commit 580f8727ca93b7b9a2ce49746b9cdbcb0a2b4a7e. << It has the syntax regexp_replace(string, pattern, replacement [, start [, N ]] [, flags ]). (Notice that N cannot be specified unless start is, but flags can be given in any case.) << doc, the above part still needs change? see my posts: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxE5p4KhGyBUwCZCxhxdU%2BzJBXy2deX4u85SL%2Bkew4F7Cw%40mail.gmail.com
