Hi, On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:40:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 02:06:11PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > Yeah, agree that it would make sense to document in the test what has been > > discovered here. > > How about something like the attached?
Thanks! A few comments: 1 === Nit s/Permutations like this one/Permutations like the following commented out one/ ? 2 === s/back its result/back its result once woken up/ ? 3 === s/faster than the wait/before the SQL function doing the wait returns its result/ ? With 2 === and 3 === I think it's easier to "link" both sentences that way. Thoughts? Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
