On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 07:26:07AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> 1 === Nit
> 
> s/Permutations like this one/Permutations like the following commented out 
> one/ ?
> 
> 2 ===
> 
> s/back its result/back its result once woken up/ ?
> 
> 3 ===
> 
> s/faster than the wait/before the SQL function doing the wait returns its 
> result/ ?
> 
> With 2 === and 3 === I think it's easier to "link" both sentences that way.

What do you think about the updated version attached?
--
Michael
diff --git a/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/basic.spec b/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/basic.spec
index 7f44e3ddc3..47db676c0c 100644
--- a/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/basic.spec
+++ b/src/test/modules/injection_points/specs/basic.spec
@@ -26,7 +26,10 @@ step wakeup2	{ SELECT injection_points_wakeup('injection-points-wait'); }
 step detach2	{ SELECT injection_points_detach('injection-points-wait'); }
 
 # Detach after wait and wakeup.
-# This permutation is proving to be unstable on FreeBSD, so disable for now.
+# Permutations like the following one commented out should be avoided, as
+# the detach may finish before the SQL function doing the wait returns
+# its result.  It is recommended to use wakeups as the last permutation
+# should a wait be done within an SQL function.
 #permutation wait1 wakeup2 detach2
 
 # Detach before wakeup.  s1 waits until wakeup, ignores the detach.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to